I was in a bad software mood this morning, which is part of why I didn't test Bandicam enough. I won't get into how one could design a real OS without those problems.

While it's probably just a harmless update check, Windows lets programs read anything and there are no restrictions on what gets communicated over the Internet, so I block Internet access for programs which don't need it. Yes, this makes a more serious attempt than most software to communicate over the Internet.

#25, JEV, I had intended to mention the security aspects. capturing same app as a rectangle works fine though.įor me it's a GAOTD offering worth keepingįor me it's a GAOTD offering worth keeping Save | Cancel I was able to record 1440x900 full screen capture with sound using xvid codec and their mpeg1 audio codec with very usable results.Īlso able to record secondlife as directx/ogl window capture with sound but on playback the video was shifted out of virtical alignment by 45 degrees, unsure why happens, regardless of codec used. It cannot record hardware accelerated video overlays, in fact it disables the hardware acceleration by default if started before the source video aplication which can break some players like Dscaler. My system does not have a soundmixer or wav out input for recording system sound output, but this program understands HD sound system API and offers on Vista at least 'Vista Sound (WASAPI)' device which captures the live sound being played via the speakers, in addition it has a secondary sound capture selection source that can be the microphone and it can then simultaniousy record the microphone for our part of a conversation and the other ends speaker output. Just installed and tested this on 32bit Vista home premium SP2.

Should i get fraps or bandicam